Comparison of the Effect of Peer and Teacher Assessment in the Development of Written Arguments of Preservice Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2019332108Keywords:
Argument-Driven Inquiry, Peer Assessment, Teacher AssessmentAbstract
In this study, it was researched which one of the effect of peer or teacher assessment would contribute more to the development of written arguments of preservice teachers in the review stage of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model. Thirty-six preservice science teachers (PSTs) participated in this study. In one of the comparison groups (n=20), ADI was used in its original form (peer assessment); while in the other group peer assessment was changed as lecturer assessment (n=16). In both groups, four ADI activities were conducted for a period such as the Oscillation of Simple Pendulum, Factors Affecting the Surface Tension, Determining the Cubes with Same Appearance and Twirly. The PSTs were asked to write three different arguments apart from they studied in the class at the beginning and end of the semester. According to results, the quality of the arguments created in each form increased from the beginning to the end of the semester, but in terms of evidence and justification, argument-writing skills of PSTs reviewed by the lecturer improved better.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Education for Life
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
I accept that the Owner of Journal of Education for Life, the Editor, Associate Editors, Reviewers and the Editorial Board cannot be hold responsible regarding the scope, the findings, the discussion and conclusion of the manuscript submitted.
I declare to the editorship of Journal of Education for Life that the manuscript is original and has not been published anywhere else or is not under evaluation process for any other journal.
I approve that I grant Journal of Education for Life as the sole and exclusive right and license to publish for the full legal term of copyright of my manuscript concurring with article 5846 / 22-23-25 while I retain copyright in the work.