Özel Eğitim Öğretmen Adaylarının Yeniden Yerleştirmesiz Çoklu Uyaran Tercihi Değerlendirme Performanslarını Artırmada Denetleyici Koçluğun Etkileri

Abbasian, G. R., & Karmalaee-Esmailee, M. (2018). Peer-coaching, EFL teacher’s professional identity development and students’ academic achievements. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(1), 150-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0801.19

Alberto, P. & Troutman, A. C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th edition.). Prentice-Hall.

Ataş, B., Özsandıkcı, I., Olcay, S., & Saral, D. (2023). Opinions about evidence-based practice among special education teachers. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 20(1), 145-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2022.2133981

Barton, E. E., Kinder, K., Casey, A. M., & Artman, K. M. (2011). Finding your feedback fit: Strategies for designing and delivering performance feedback systems. Young Exceptional Children, 14(1), 29-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250610395459

Besler, F., & Süzer, T. (2016). Pekiştirme. E. Tekin-İftar (Ed.), Uygulamalı davranış analizi içinde (ss. 213-267). Vize Yayıncılık.

Bojak, S. L., & Carr, J. E. (1999). On the displacement of leisure items by food during multiple‐stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(4), 515-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1999.32-515

Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2015). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49(1), 39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913501882

Brodhead, M. T., Abston, G. W., Mates, M., & Abel, E. A. (2017). Further refinement of video based brief multiple‐stimulus without replacement preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(1), 170-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.358

Brodhead, M. T., Al-Dubayan, M. N., Mates, M., Abel, E. A., & Brouwers, L. (2016). An evaluation of a brief video-based multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(2016), 160-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0081-0

Çakmak, A. (2015). Görme engeli olan çok engelli çocuklar için etkili olan pekiştireç değerlendirme yönteminin belirlenmesi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi.

Call, N. A., Trosclair‐Lasserre, N. M., Findley, A. J., Reavis, A. R., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2012). Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive‐ratio schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(4), 763-777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-763

Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple‐stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33(3), 353-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353

Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 135–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402913079002021

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward W.L. (20072014). Applied behaviour analysis. (2nd Ed.). Pearson New International Edition.

Cornelius, K. E., Rosenberg, M. S., & Sandmel, K. N. (2020). Examining the impact of professional development and coaching on mentoring of novice special educators. Action in Teacher Education, 42(3), 253-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1638847

Correa, M. H. (2021). The effects of training on parent-implemented multiple stimulus preference assessments without replacement [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. College of Psychology and Liberal Arts of Florida Institute of Technology.

Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: professional ethics and standards. CEC. https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/Standards%20for%20Professional%20Practice.pdf

Curiel, H., Curiel, E. S., Adame, A., & Li, A. (2020). Multiple‐stimulus‐without‐replacement preference assessment tool. Behavioral Interventions, 35(4), 680-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1732

Daly, E. J., Wells, N. J., Swanger‐Gagné, M. S., Carr, J. E., Kunz, G. M., & Taylor, A. M. (2009). Evaluation of the multiple‐stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(3), 563-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-563

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

DeBettencourt, L. U., & Nagro, S. A. (2019). Tracking special education teacher candidates’ reflective practices over time. Remedial and Special Education, 40(5), 277-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518762573

DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple‐stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519

DeLeon, I. G., Iwata, B. A., & Roscoe, E. M. (1997). Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(3), 475-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-475

Dudek, C. M., Reddy, L. A., Lekwa, A., Hua, A. N., & Fabiano, G. A. (2019). Improving universal classroom practices through teacher formative assessment and coaching. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 44(2), 81-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418772919

Eldeniz-Çetin, M., Sivrikaya, T., & Şen, G. S. (2018). Zihinsel yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin pekiştireç tercihlerinin incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 6(4), 458-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.334258

Erbaş, D. (2017). Problem davranışlarının işlevlerini belirleme. E. Dilek ve Ş. Yücesoy-Özkan (Ed.), Uygulamalı davranış analizi içinde (s. 215-265). Pegem Akademi Yayınları. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052411414.06

Erbaş, D., Özen, A., & Acar, C. (2004). Comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers in teaching figure coloring to students with Down syndrome. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(3), 253-264.

Ergül, C., Baydık, B., & Demir, Ş. (2013). Özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının ve öğretmenlerinin zihin engelliler öğretmenliği lisans programı yeterliklerine ilişkin görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(1), 499-522.

Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., & Amari, A. (1996). Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101(1), 15-25.

Fixsen, D., Blase, K., Metz, A., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 213–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402913079002071

Fritz, J. N., Roath, C. T., Shoemaker, P. T., Edwards, A. B., Hussein, L. A., Villante, N. K., ... & Rettig, L. A. (2020). Validity of the multiple‐stimulus without replacement preference assessment for edible items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1688-1701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.703

Gallagher, T. L., & Bennett, S. M. (2018). The six “P” model: principles of coaching for inclusion coaches. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(1), 19-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2017-0018

Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe design. In J. R. Ledford & D. L. Gast (Eds), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (pp. 239-282). Routledge Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150666-10

Graff, R. B., & Karsten, A. M. (2012). Assessing preferences of individuals with developmental disabilities: A survey of current practices. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(2012), 37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391822

Grisham-Brown, J., Değirmenci, H. D., Snyder, D., & Luiselli, T. E. (2018). Improving practices for learners with deaf-blindness: A consultation and coaching model. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(5), 263–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918763123

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

Hagopian, L. P., Toole, L. M., Long, E. S., Bowman, L. G., & Lieving, G. A. (2004). A comparison of dense‐to‐lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(3), 323-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-323

Harn, B., Parisi, D., & Stoolmiller, M. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402913079002051

Hoffmann, A. N., Paskins, R. T., Brady‐Ruehs, A. M., & Sellers, T. P. (2023). An examination of stimulus technology level and preference displacement during multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessments. Behavioral Interventions, 38(3), 671-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1937

Hsiao, Y. J., & Sorensen Petersen, S. (2019). Evidence-based practices provided in teacher education and in-service training programs for special education teachers of students with autism spectrum disorders. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(3), 193-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418758464

Johnson, E. S., Zheng, Y., Crawford, A. R., & Moylan, L. A. (2019). Developing an explicit instruction special education teacher observation rubric. The Journal of Special Education, 53(1), 28-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918796224

Karabıyık, V., & Işıkdoğan Uğurlu, N. (2019). Zihin engelliler öğretmenliği bölümü öğretmen adaylarının özel eğitim uygulama merkezlerinde yapılan öğretimsel düzenlemelere ilişkin görüşleri. Folklor/Edebiyat, 25(97), 591-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.970

Karasu, N., Aykut, Ç., & Yılmaz, B. (2014). Zihin engelliler öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitim ihtiyaçlarının belirlenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 41-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1501/Ozlegt_0000000191

Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press.

Kennedy, A. (2014). Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education, 40(5), 688-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.955122

Kohler, F. W., Ezell, H. K., & Paluselli, M. (1999). Promoting changes in teachers’ conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching. The Journal of Special Education, 33(3), 154–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903300303

Kretlow, A. G., & Bartholomew, C. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 279-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406410371643

Mathews, H. M., Myers, A. M., & Youngs, P. A. (2023). The role of teacher self-efficacy in special education teacher candidates’ sensemaking: A mixed-methods investigation. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3), 209-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221101812

Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2023). Mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri. MEB. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/mesleki-gelisim-faaliyetleri/icerik/7

Morris, S. L., Allen, A. E., & Gallagher, M. L. (2023). Evaluating the number of sessions in multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessments for social interaction. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), 102-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000264

Nagro, S. A., & DeBettencourt, L. U. (2017). Reviewing special education teacher preparation field experience placements, activities, and research: Do we know the difference maker? Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(3), 7–33.

Odom, S. L., Cox, A. W., & Brock, M. E. (2013). Implementation science, Professional development, and autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 233-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402913079002081

Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L. and Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006

Payne, S. W., Fulgencio, C. T., & Aniga, R. N. (2023). A comparison of paired‐and multiple‐stimulus‐without‐replacement preference assessments to identify reinforcers for dog behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 120(1), 78-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.857

Paynter, J. M., Ferguson, S., Fordyce, K., Joosten, A., Paku, S., Stephens, M., . . . Keen, D. (2017). Utilization of evidence-based practices by ASD early intervention service providers. Autism, 21(2), 167-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316633032

Raetz, P. B., LeBlanc, L. A., Baker, J. C., & Hilton, L. C. (2013). Utility of the multiple stimulus without replacement procedure and stability of preferences of older adults with dementia. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(4), 765-780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.88

Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single‐subject experimental research: description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 11-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12091

Rakap, S. (2017a). Türkiye’de otizm spektrum bozukluğu ve özel eğitim. Tohum Otizm Vakfı. https://tohumotizm.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/tosboe2017.pdf

Rakap, S. (2017b). Impact of coaching on preservice teachers’ use of embedded instruction in inclusive preschool classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 125-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685753

Richman, D. M., Barnard-Brak, L., Abby, L., & Grubb, L. (2016). Multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment: Reducing the number of sessions to identify preferred stimuli. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(2016), 469-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9485-1

Rispoli, M., Zaini, S., Mason, R., Brodhead, M., Burke, M. D., & Gregori, E. (2017). A systematic review of teacher self-monitoring on implementation of behavioral practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63(2017), 58-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.007

Roscoe, E. M., & Fisher, W. W. (2008). Evaluation of an efficient method for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(2), 249-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2008.41-249

Rush, K. S., Mortenson, B. P., & Birch, S. E. (2010). Evaluation of preference assessment procedures for use with infants and toddlers. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 6(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100893

Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., & McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 396-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700407

Schles, R. A., & Robertson, R. E. (2019). The role of performance feedback and implementation of evidence-based practices for preservice special education teachers and student outcomes: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42(1), 36-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417736571

Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 189-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189

Sipila-Thomas, E. S., Brodhead, M. T., & Walker, A. N. (2022). The effects of email performance-based feedback on teacher candidate implementation of a multiple stimulus without replacement preference assessment. Journal of Behavioral Education, 33, 297-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-022-09496-z

Snyder, K., Higbee, T. S., & Dayton, E. (2012). Preliminary investigation of a video-based stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(2), 413–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-413

Torres, C., Farley, C. A., & Cook, B. G. (2012). A special educator’s guide to successfully implementing evidence-based practices. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(2), 64–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991204500109

Turhan, C., Ünal, F., & Toper-Korkmaz, Ö. (2018). Özel eğitim alanında çalışan öğretmenlere sistematik pekiştireç değerlendirme yönteminin öğretimi. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 79-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.286679

Weldy, C. R., Rapp, J. T., & Capocasa, K. (2014). Training staff to implement brief stimulus preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(1), 214-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.98

What Works Clearinghouse (WWC, 2022). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook (Version 5.0). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks

Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203

Yücesoy-Özkan, Ş., Kaya, F., & Gülboy, E. (2022). Uygun davranışları artırma. Ş. Yücesoy Özkan & D. Erbaş (Ed.), Uygulamalı davranış analizi (5. baskı) içinde (ss. 262-316). Pegem Akademi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052411414.07