Öğrencilerin Sosyoekonomik Durumu, İçsel Motivasyonu ve Okulun Başarıya Verdiği Önemin Öğrencilerin Matematik Başarılarına Etkisi

Akyüz, G. (2014). The effects of student and school factors on mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011 [Special Issue: Large Scale Assessment]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(172), 150–162.

Albayrakoglu, O., & Yildirim, S. (2022). School characteristics mediating the relationship between school socioeconomic status and mathematics achievement. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(1), 98-117.

Arıkan, S., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Yağmur, K. (2016). Factors contributing to mathematics achievement differences of Turkish and Australian students in 2007 and 2011. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2039–2059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1268a

Aslan, M., & Doğan, S. (2020). Dışsal motivasyon, içsel motivasyon ve performans etkileşimine kuramsal bir bakış. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 11(26), 291–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.638479

Bakış, O., Levent, H., İnsel, A., & Polat, S. (2009). Türkiye’de egitime erisimin belirleyicileri. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/yayin/turkiyede-egitime-erisimin-belirleyicileri/

Balcı, A. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. (10. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

Batyra, A. (2017). Enrollment in early childhood education and care in Turkey. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. https://en.egitimreformugirisimi.org/issue/enrollment-in-early-childhood-education-and-care-in-turkey/

Berkowitz, R. (2017). A research synthesis of the associations between socioeconomic background, inequality, school climate, and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 425–469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669821

Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019). Socioeconomic inequality and educational outcomes: evidence from twenty years of TIMSS. Springer Open. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1

Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd Edition). The Guilford Press.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (16. Baskı). Pegem Akademi Yayınları.

Çalık, T., & Kurt, T. (2010). Okul İklimi Ölçeği’nin nin (OİÖ) geliştirilmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(157), 167–180.

Çalık, T., Kurt, T., & Çalık, C. (2011). Güvenli okul oluşturulmasında okul iklimi: kavramsal bir çözümleme. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(4), 73–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/C1S4M8

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED012 275.pdf

Doğan, N., & Barış, F. (2010). Tutum, değer ve özyeterlik değişkenlerinin TIMSS-1999 ve TIMSS-2007 sınavlarında öğrencilerin matematik başarılarını yordama düzeyleri. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 1(1), 44–50.

Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K. (2013). Investing in preschool programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2), 109–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.2.109

Eğitim Reformu Girişimi (2009). Eğitimde eşitlik: Politika analyizi ve öneriler. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/yayin/egitimde-esitlik-politika-analizi-ve-oneriler/

Eğitim Reformu Girişimi (2016). Her çocuğa eşit fırsat: Türkiye’de erken çocukluk eğitiminin durumu ve öneriler. Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/her-cocuga-esit-firsat-turkiyede-erken-cocukluk-egitiminin-durumu-ve-oneriler/

Engle, P. L., Fernald, L. C. H., Alderman, H., Behrman, J., O’Gara, C., Yousafzai, A., & Iltus, S. (2011). Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 378(9799), 1339–1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60889-1

Erberber, E., Stephens, M., Mamedova, S., Ferguson, S., & Kroeger, T. (2015). Socioeconomically disadvantaged students who are academically successful: examining academic resilience cross-nationally. IEA’s Policy Brief Series, No. 5. https://www.iea.nl/policy_briefs.html

Ersan, O., & Rodriguez, M.C. (2020). Socioeconomic status and beyond: a multilevel analysis of TIMSS mathematics achievement given student and school context in Turkey. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 8, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00093-y

Foy, P. (2004). Intraclass correlation and variance components as population attributes and measures of sampling efficiency in PIRLS 2001. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement website. https://www.iea.nl/publications/list

Geesa, R. L., Izci, B., Song, H., & Chen, S. (2019). Exploring factors of home resources and attitudes towards mathematics in mathematics achievement in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 15(9), em1751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108487

Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (1998). Role of cognitively stimulating home environment in children’s academic intrinsic motivation: a longitudinal study. Child Development, 69(5), 1448–1460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06223.x

Gustafsson, J. E., Nilsen, T., & Hansen-Yang, K. (2018). School characteristics moderating the relation between student socio-economic status and mathematics achievement in grade 8. evidence from 50 countries in TIMSS 2011. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 57, 16–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.09.004

Harwell, M. (2018). Don’t expect too much: The limited usefulness of common SES measures. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(3), 353–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1465382

Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (3rd Edition). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746494

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (2013). TIMSS 2011 international database. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/international-database.html

Kagitcibasi, C., Sunar, D., Bekman, S., Baydar, N., & Cemalcilar, Z. (2009). Continuing effects of early enrichment in adult life: The Turkish Early Enrichment Project 22 years later. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 764–779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.05.003

Kılıç, S., & Aşkın O. E. (2013). Parental influence on students’ mathematics achievement: the comparative study of Turkey and best performer countries in TIMSS 2011. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2000–2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.228

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd Edition). The Guilford Press.

Martin, M.O., & Mullis, I.V.S. (2012). Methods and procedures in TIMSS & PIRLS 2011. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/methods/index.html

Meinck, S., Stancel-Piątak, A., & Verdisco, A. (2018). Preparing the ground: The importance of early learning activities at home for fourth grade student achievement. IEA Compass: Briefs in Education No 3.

Mullis, I. V.S., Martin, M.O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Mullis, I. V.S., Martin, M.O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (Sixth Edition). Muthén & Muthén.

Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2014) School emphasis on academic success: exploring changes in science performance in Norway between 2007 and 2011 employing two-level SEM. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20(4), 308–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.941371

Oral, I., & McGivney, E. J. (2014). Türkiye’de eğitim sisteminde eşitlik ve akademik basari: arastirma raporu ve analiz. Education Reform Initiative. https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/turkiye-egitim-sisteminde-esitlik-ve-akademik-basari/

Osborne, J. W. (2000). Advantages of hierarchical linear modeling. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(1), 1–4.

Østbø, I. U., & Zachrisson, H. D. (2022) Student motivation and parental attitude as mediators for SES effects on mathematics achievement: evidence from Norway in TIMSS 2015. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 808–823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1939138

Owens, A. (2018). Income segregation between school districts and inequality in students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 9(1), 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040717741180

Owens, A., Reardon, S. F., & Jencks, C. (2016). Income segregation between schools and school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1159–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216652722

Özer, M., Gençoğlu, C., & Suna, H. E. (2020). Türkiye’de eğitimde eşitsizlikleri azaltmak için uygulanan politikalar. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(2), 294–312.

Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Sage Publication.

Sarı, M. H., Arıkan, S., & Yıldızlı, H. (2017). 8. sınıf matematik akademik başarısını yordayan faktörler: TIMSS 2015. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 8(3), 246–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.303689

Sarıer, Y. (2020). TIMSS uygulamalarında Türkiye’nin performansı ve akademik başarıyı yordayan değişkenler. Temel Eğitim Dergisi, 2(2), 6–27.

Sülkü, S. N., & Abdioğlu, Z. (2015). Public and private school distinction, regional development differences, and other factors influencing the success of primary school students in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(2), 419–431.

Suna, H. E., & Özer, M. (2021). Türkiye’de sosyoekonomik düzey ve okullar arası başarı farklarının akademik başarı ile ilişkisi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 12(1), 54–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.860431

Suna, H. E., & Özer, M. (2022). The relationship of preschool attendance with academic achievement and socioeconomic status in Turkey. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 13(1), 54–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1060460

Tavşancıl, E., & Yalçın, S. (2015). A determination of Turkish student’s achievement using hierarchical linear models in trends in international mathematics-science study (TIMSS) 2011. The Anthropologist, 22(2), 390–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891891

Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2012). Preschools reduce early academic achievement gaps: A longitudinal approach. Psychological Science, 23(3), 310–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611426728

Ünal, I., Özsoy, S., Yıldız, A., Güngör, S., Aylar, E., & Çankaya, D. (2010). Egitimde toplumsal ayrisma. Ankara University Publishing.

Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: applications using mplus (First Edition). Wiley Publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118356258

Wang, L., & Finch, H. (2018). Motivation variables mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychology and Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 55, 123–136.

Yang, Y., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2004). Measuring socioeconomic status at individual and collective levels. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(3), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.3.259.30268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.3.259.30268

Yang, Z., Barnard-Brak, L., & Siwatu, K. (2019). How does the availability of information and communication technology (ict) resources mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and achievement? Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4, 262–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0079-x

Yavuz, H. Ç., Demirtaşlı, R. N., Yalçın, S., & Dibek, M. İ. (2017). Türk öğrencilerin TIMSS 2007 ve 2011 matematik başarısında öğrenci ve öğretmen özelliklerinin etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(189), 27–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6885

Yayan, B. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of mathematics achievement in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study-Repeat (TIMSS-R) [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi.

Yetkiner-Özel, Z. E., Özel, S., & Thompson, B. (2013). SES-related mathematics achievement gap in Turkey compared to European Union countries. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(170), 179–193.

Yıldırım, S. (2011). Öz-yeterlik, içe yönelik motivasyon, kaygı ve matematik başarısı: Türkiye, Japonya ve Finlandiya'dan bulgular. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi (EFMED), 5(1), 277–291.

Yıldırım, S. (2012) Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.596855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.596855

Zopluoglu, C. (2012). A cross-national comparison of intra-class correlation coefficient in educational achievement outcomes. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 3(1), 242–278.