Ortaöğretime Geçiş Sınavlarının PISA Fen Okuryazarlığı Çerçevesine Göre Analizi: Bilgi Türleri Boyutu

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186

Bennett, R. E. (2024). Personalizing assessment: Dream or nightmare? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 43(4), 119–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12652

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014a). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (Eds.). (2014b). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning. Jossey-Bass. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119210863

DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L

Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. National Academies Press.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of epistemic cognition. Routledge.

Güler, N. (2014). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Pegem Akademi.

Harlen, W. (2010). Principles and big ideas of science education. Association for Science Education.

Harlen, W. (2015). Assessment and inquiry-based science education. Global Network of Science Academies.

Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Open University Press.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.

Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Sontay, G. (2012). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde bağlam temelli öğrenme yaklaşımı. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 20(3), 827–844.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781

Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2019). PISA 2018 Türkiye ön raporu. MEB.

Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2023). PISA 2022 Türkiye raporu. Ölçme, Değerlendirme ve Sınav Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. https://pisa.meb.gov.tr

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264255425-en

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035

Osborne, J. (2020). Argumentation in science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 559–577). Routledge.

Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ideas-about-science should be taught in school science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105

Özdemir, S. M. (2010). Eğitimde program değerlendirme ve Türkiye’de uygulamalar. Pegem Akademi.

Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2020). The future of educational assessment. In H. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 3–20). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166933-1

Phillips, R. S., & Norris, S. P. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066

Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529682571

Sireci, S. G. (2020). Standardization and UNDERSTANDardization in educational assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 39(3), 100–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12377

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (11. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.