Ortaokulda STEM ve Matematiksel Modellemenin Entegrasyonu: Öğrencilerin Motivasyon, Tutum ve Modelleme Yeterliklerinin İncelenmesi

Adler, R. M., Rittle-Johnson, B., Hickendorff, M., & Durkin, K. (2024). A longitudinal examination of the relations between motivation, math achievement, and STEM career aspirations among Black students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 76, 102240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102240

Akarsu, M., Akçay, N. O., & Elmas, R. (2020). STEM eğitimi yaklaşımının özellikleri ve değerlendirilmesi [Characteristics and evaluation of STEM education approach]. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 37, 155-175.

Akgündüz, D., Aydeniz, M., Çakmakçı, G., Çavaş, B., Çorlu, M., Öner, T., & Özdemir, S. (2015). STEM eğitimi Türkiye raporu: Günümüz modası mı yoksa gereksinim mi? [STEM education Turkey report: A temporary fad or a necessity?]. Istanbul Aydin University STEM Center.

Andersen, L., & Ward, T. J. (2013). An expectancy-value model for the STEM persistence of ninth-grade, underrepresented minority students. In R. T. Palmer & J. L. Wood (Eds.), Community colleges and STEM: Examining student success (pp. 79–94). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203568446-12

Anhalt, C. O., Cortez, R., & Bennett, A. B. (2018). The emergence of mathematical modeling competencies: An investigation of prospective secondary mathematics teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(3), 202-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1474532

Ärlebäck, J. B., & Albarracín, L. (2019). The use and potential of Fermi problems in the STEM disciplines to support the development of twenty-first century competencies. ZDM, 51(6), 979-990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01075-3

Ärlebäck, J. B., & Albarracín, L. (2024). Lessons learned from research on Fermi problems and mathematical modelling: Theoretical and practical implications for school STEM education. In T. Barkatsas (Ed.), The contribution of mathematics to school STEM education: Current understandings (pp. 201-219). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2728-5_12

Armutcu, Y., & Bal, A. P. (2023). The effect of mathematical modeling activities on students' mathematical modeling skills in the context of STEM education. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(1), 42-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1131928

Arslan, T., & İnan Sonakalan, E. (2022). STEM eğitimi almış sınıf öğretmenlerinin derslerde STEM uygulamalarına yer verememelerinin gerekçeleri [The reasons of classroom teachers who can not reflect the STEM education received in classroom practices]. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 9(82), 667-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.3047

Bakker, A., & Wagner, D. (2020). Pandemic: lessons for today and tomorrow? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(1), 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09946-3

Bayanova, A. R., Orekhovskaya, N. A., Sokolova, N. L., Shaleeva, E. F., Knyazeva, S. A., & Budkevich, R. L. (2023). Exploring the role of motivation in STEM education: A systematic review. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), em2250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13086

Blum, W. (1991). Applications and modelling in mathematics teaching – A review of arguments and instructional aspects. In M. Niss, W. Blum, & I. Huntley (Eds.), Modelling applications (pp. 10–29). Ellis Horwood.

Blum, W., & Leiss, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, engineering and economics—ICTMA 12 (pp. 222–231). Horwood. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.5.221

Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1989). Mathematical problem solving, modelling, application, and links to other subjects – State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. In M. Niss, W. Blum, & I. Huntley (Eds.), Modelling applications and applied problem solving (pp. 1–19). Halsted Press.

Bolat, Y. İ., & Gülcü, A. (2022). STEM temelli matematik uygulamaları. Efe Akademi Yayınları.

Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(2), 86–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655883

Borromeo Ferri, R. (2018). Learning how to teach mathematical modeling in school and teacher education. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68072-9

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications (Full report). BSCS. https://bscs.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/bscs_5e_full_report-1.pdf

Cevikbas, M., Mießeler, D., & Kaiser, G. (2025). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ experiences and insights into the benefits and challenges of using explanatory videos in flipped modelling education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01650-x

Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898–909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6

Corrêa, P. D. (2021). The mathematical proficiency promoted by mathematical modelling. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 107–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.424

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.

Czocher, J. A., Melhuish, K., & Kandasamy, S. S. (2020). Building mathematics self-efficacy of STEM undergraduates through mathematical modelling. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 807–834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1634223

Çavuş-Erdem, Z. (2018). Matematiksel modelleme etkinliklerine dayalı öğrenim sürecinin alan ölçme konusu bağlamında incelenmesi (Investigation of the learning process based on mathematical modeling activities in the context of area measurement) [Doctoral dissertation]. Adıyaman University.

Çavuş-Erdem, Z., Doğan, M. F., & Gürbüz, R. (2021). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin disiplinler arası matematiksel modelleme becerilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of middle school students' interdisciplinary mathematical modeling skills]. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10(4), 1763–1788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.927243

Deng, W., Chen, G., & Feng, R. (2025). The STEM curriculum integration through big ideas and learning progression frameworks: Attitudes and insights from teacher and student. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2025.2555184

Deniz, Ş., & Kurt, G. (2022). Investigation of mathematical modeling processes of middle school students in model-eliciting activities (MEAs): A STEM approach. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 150–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.34.9.2

Doğan, M. F., Gürbüz, R., Çavuş-Erdem, Z., & Şahin, S. (2019). Using mathematical modeling for integrating STEM disciplines: A theoretical framework. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 628–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.502007

Dönmez, İ. (2020). STEM motivasyon ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Adaptation of STEM motivation scale into Turkish: Validity and reliability study]. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 17(1), 486–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.693825

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

English, L. D. (2023). Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(6), 1219–1230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7

English, L. D., & Gainsburg, J. (2016). Problem solving in a 21st-century mathematics curriculum. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (3rd ed., pp. 313–335). Routledge.

English, L. D., & King, D. (2019). STEM integration in sixth grade: Designing and constructing paper bridges. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 863–884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9912-0

Fong, C. J., & Kremer, K. P. (2020). An expectancy-value approach to math underachievement: Examining high school achievement, college attendance, and STEM interest. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(2), 67–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219890599

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. (2012). Middle and high school STEM-student survey. North Carolina State University.

Gamboa, G. D., Badillo, E., Couso, D., & Márquez, C. (2021). Connecting mathematics and science in primary school STEM education: Modeling the population growth of species. Mathematics, 9(19), 2496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192496

Genç, M., & Karataş, İ. (2017). Problem çözme süreçlerinde öğrencilerin modelleme seviyelerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of students' modeling levels in problem solving processes]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 608–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2017.18.3.032

Gök, M., & Demir, N. (2021). The Opinions of Mathematics Teachers about Using Mathematical Modeling in the Solution of Daily Life Problems and an Application of the Chinese Remainder Theorem. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3), 100-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.322

Gök, M., & Yılmaz, T. Y. (2025). Mathematical modeling in the context of out-of-school learning: Exploring the potential of universities. In S. Alkan, G. Karaali, & M. Taştepe (Eds.), Mathematics beyond the classroom (pp. 215–236). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05318-3_10

Gürbüz, R., & Doğan, M. F. (2019). Giriş: Matematiksel modellemeye disiplinler arası bakış: Bir STEM yaklaşımı. In R. Gürbüz & M. F. Doğan (Eds.), Matematiksel modellemeye disiplinler arası bakış: Bir STEM yaklaşımı (2nd ed., pp. 1–5). Pegem Akademi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052414712

Ha, V. T., Chung, L. H., Hanh, N. V., & Hai, B. M. (2023). Teaching science using argumentation-supported 5E-STEM, 5E-STEM, and conventional didactic methods: Differences in the learning outcomes of middle school students. Education Sciences, 13(3), 247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030247

Hallström, J., & Schönborn, K. J. (2019). Models and modelling for authentic STEM education: Reinforcing the argument. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0178-z

Imaduddin, M., Praptaningrum, D. N. W., & Safitri, D. A. (2020). Students’ attitude toward STEM project-based learning in the fun cooking activity to learn about the colloid system. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(1), 14–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.820898

Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Moore, T. J. (Eds.). (2015). STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753157

Kalaycı, Ş. (2008). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kertil, M., & Gurel, C. (2016). Mathematical modeling: A bridge to STEM education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 44–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.95761

Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). Impact of environmental power monitoring activities on middle school student perceptions of STEM. Science Education International, 24(1), 98–123.

Ling, L. S., Pang, V., & Lajium, D. (2019). Evaluation of the implementation of a science project through the application of integrated STEM education as an approach. International Journal of Education, 4(33), 263–283.

Lopes, A. P. C. (2022). Aspects of attitudes towards mathematics in modeling activities: Usefulness, interest, and social roles of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), em0711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12394

Luo, T., Wang, J., Liu, X., & Zhou, J. (2019). Development and application of a scale to measure students’ STEM continuing motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1885–1904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1647472

Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441

Manunure, K., & Leung, A. (2024). Integrating inquiry and mathematical modeling when teaching a common topic in lower secondary school: An iSTEM approach. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1376951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1376951

Mayerhofer, M., Lüftenegger, M., & Eichmair, M. (2024). The development of mathematics expectancy-value profiles during the secondary–tertiary transition into STEM fields. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), Article 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00491-6

Mertkan, Ş. (2015). Karma araştırma tasarımı. Pegem.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.

Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(1), 5–10.

Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Ş. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. E. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 35–60). Purdue University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.7

National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. The National Academies Press.

Okamoto, H., Hartmann, M., & Kawasaki, T. (2023). Analysis of the relationship between creativity in Fermi problems measured by applying information theory, creativity in psychology, and mathematical creativity. Education Sciences, 13(3), 315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030315

Ozturk, D. Z., & Cinar, S. (2022). The effect of engineering design based STEM education on the problem-solving skills of pre-school students. Trakya Journal of Education, 12(1), 34–56.

Özcan, H., & Koca, E. (2019). Turkish adaptation of the attitude towards STEM scale: A validity and reliability study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(2), 387–401.

Perez, T., Wormington, S. V., Barger, M. M., Schwartz‐Bloom, R. D., Lee, Y. K., & Linnenbrink‐Garcia, L. (2019). Science expectancy, value, and cost profiles and their proximal and distal relations to undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math persistence. Science Education, 103(2), 264–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21490

Rhodes, T., & Lancaster, K. (2020). Mathematical models as public troubles in COVID-19 infection control: Following the numbers. Health Sociology Review, 29(2), 177–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2020.1764376

Roberts, T., Maiorca, C., Jackson, C., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. (2022). Integrated STEM as problem-solving practices. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 14(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.2024721

Saldaña, J. (2011). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Schuchardt, A., & Roehrig, G. (2024). Critical thinking in mathematics and mathematical modeling related to STEM. In L. D. English (Ed.), Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving (pp. 205–217). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003404989-15

Shankar, S., Lee, S. Y., Johnson, C. D., & Robinson, K. A. (2025). Make or break STEM course experiences: Profiles of situated expectancy, value, cost, and major intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 82, 102404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102404

Slavit, D., Grace, E., & Lesseig, K. (2021). Student ways of thinking in STEM contexts: A focus on claim making and reasoning. School Science and Mathematics, 121(8), 466–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12501

Stillman, G. A., Blum, W., & Kaiser, G. (2017). Crossing boundaries in mathematical modelling and applications educational research and practice. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and applications: Crossing and researching boundaries in mathematics education (pp. 1–32). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62968-1_53

Stillman, G., Kaiser, G., & Lampen, C. (2020). Sense-making in mathematical modelling and applications educational research and practice. In G. A. Stillman, G. Kaiser, & C. E. Lampen (Eds.), Mathematical modelling education and sense-making (pp. 15–29). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_2

Tasarib, A., Rosli, R., & Rambely, A. S. (2025). Impacts and challenges of mathematical modelling activities on students’ learning development: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(5), em2641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16398

Turner, E. E., Roth McDuffie, A., Bennett, A. B., Aguirre, J., Chen, M. K., Foote, M. Q., & Smith, J. E. (2022). Mathematical modeling in the elementary grades: Developing and testing an assessment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1387–1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10195-w

Turner, R., Blum, W., & Niss, M. (2014). Using competencies to explain mathematical item demand: A work in progress. In K. Stacey & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience (pp. 85–115). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_4

Tytler, R. (2020). STEM education for the twenty-first century. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 21–43). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_3

Wang, H.-H., Charoenmuang, M., Knobloch, N. A., & Tormoehlen, R. L. (2020). Defining interdisciplinary collaboration based on high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of STEM integration using a complex designed system. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, Article 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0201-4

Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001

Wang, T., Zhang, L., Xie, Z., & Liu, J. (2023). How does mathematical modeling competency affect the creativity of middle school students? The roles of curiosity and guided inquiry teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1044580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1044580

Wigfield, A., Muenks, K., & Eccles, J. S. (2021). Achievement motivation: What we know and where we are going. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 87–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050720-103500

Yanar, A. N., & Ergene, Ö. (2024). Farklı eğitim seviyelerindeki katılımcıların sosyo-kritik matematiksel modelleme etkinliği çözüm süreçlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the solution processes of socio-critical mathematical modeling activity of participants at different educational levels]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 830–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1495955

Yılmaz, A., & Usta, N. (2024). Kavram karikatürleri destekli 5E modeli uygulamasının ortaokul öğrencilerinin matematik başarılarına ve öğrenilenlerin kalıcılığına etkisi [The effect of concept cartoons supported 5E model application on middle school students' mathematics achievements and retention of learning]. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences (JOSHAS), 9(68), 3435–3447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29228/JOSHAS.71970